No Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam had ever done any mistakes intentionally; and not even unintentionally, they are undoubtedly innocent.
Allah Dictates, “Verily Allah has nominated Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam (as Rwasool).” Those who say, ‘Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam, The Nabi and Rwasool of Allah Pak had done a mistake and committed sins by eating gandhum’ – this belief and concept of theirs is absolutely kufri according to the Ahle Sunnat wal Jam’at. Refraining from such Aqida (doing Tawbah) is a Fard-Wajib (must) for all concerned.
Prime Point of Allah’s attention, Imam and Mujtahid of the age, Imamul Aimmah, Kutubul A’alam, Awladur Rwasool, Habeebullah, Mamduh Hazrat Murshid Qibla Mudda Zilluhul A’alee of Rajarbagh Darbar Shareef, Dhaka said, “The Aqida of the Ahle Sunnat wal Jam’at is that ‘no Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam had ever done any mistakes intentionally; and not even unintentionally’. This means that Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam had done no mistakes. (Sharhe Aqaide Nasfii, Fiqhe Akbar, Taqmilul Imaan, Aqaide Haqqa). All Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam were among the most exclusively selected ones by Allah Pak and they were all regulated by Ohi from Allah.”
‘In the Qur’an Shareef, it has been dictated in more than one places that, “I sent Ohi to Them (Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam)”. (Sura Yusuf/109, Sura Nahl/43, Sura Ambia/7). This says that all acts of the Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam were controlled through Ohi (messages from Allah Pak).”
“Books of Aqaid say that, ‘All Ambia Alaihimus Salaam were Ma’asum or sinless.”
“All Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam were free from and pure of all kufri, shirq and sins like swaghirah and qabirah and all other undesirable acts.”
“Those who speak of the follies of Nabi Rwasool Alaihimus Salaam in fact do it out of their own ignorance on Aqaid and lacking in the knowledge of the right history. Like some would say, ‘Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam, The Nabi and Rwasool of Allah Pak did a mistake and earned sins through eating the fruit called gandhum. (Na’uzubillah!).”
“Basically this concept of theirs is not at all correct, rather sheer kufri. The actual happening is-when Allah forbade Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam and Hazrat Haoa (Eve) Alaihis Salaam that “Don’t get near this (gandhum) tree” . (Sura Baqara/35). Then as per the instructions of Allah Pak, They did not go near it. Rather pointing to a similar tree in the opposite direction, satan came up and made a farce swearing in front of Hazrat Haoa Alaihis Salaam, saying, ‘if you would eat that fruit, you shall become angels and live in the heavens forever’. Some narrations describe, accordingly Hazrat Haoa Alaihis Salaam brought a fruit from that tree and offered its extracted juice to Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam. Some say, offered the fruit itself. This took place without the notice of Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam. Something that happens unnoticing, how could that be a deliberate offense or a slip? Virtually, that was never a mistake.”
As an example, cites the incident of the ‘Shahadah’ (martyrdom) of Hazrat Imam Hasan RwadiAllahu Ta’ala. “There is no doubt that he was a Shaheed (martyr). To make Him a Martyr (kill Him), the enemies of Islam poisoned Him as many as five times. But every time He recovered by the grace of Allah. The sixth time, enemies sprinkled the poison of diamond dust into His water jar which He sealed with a piece of fabric (so that nothing could be dropped). This was done without His knowledge. At midnight, He drank from that jar which led Him to His Martyrdom.” (Sirrush Shahadatain, Shuhada-i-Karbala, Sirat-i-Imam Hasan and Imam Hussain RwadiAllahu Ta’ala Anhuma) .
“Now the question comes up that as per Shariat, what this Shahadah should be called? A suicide or a death by mistake? In fact none out of those two. If anyone claiming even one, he shall be held responsible for farcical blames, which would amount to kufri. Similar is the incident of Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam which took place without His notice.”
“Those describing the ‘Hadis Shareef’ of Habeebullah, Imaamul Mursaalin, Sayeedul Mursaalin, Huzur Pak Swallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam are known as ‘Raabi’. The leading and top class among them is known as ‘Seka Raabi’. The standards fixed by the Hadis Shareef experts to become a “Seka Raabi” has two main aspects – (1) Adalat (2) Jabt. Jabt is sharp memory, that’s such that just hearing once, one would never forget it. And Adalat (justice) has four conditions out of which two are prominent; like (a) Taqwa and (b) Muruwat. (a). Taqwa is refraining from acts of kufri (disbelieving), shirq (equaling with Allah), bid’at (anything that’s new and harmful) and fasiqi (believer but not a performer) and from the qabirah (worst) sins and even from frequently committing swaghirah (minor) sins. (b). Muruwat is saving oneself from indecent, crude and undesired acts and words like taking food while walking on the streets, making big laughter and shouts in open, urinating hither and thither etc. (Tadribur Raabi, Mukaddamatush-Shayokh, Meezanul Akhbar).
“If as an expert on Hadis Shareef, a ‘Seka Raabi’, the narrator of Hadis Shareef, needs to acquire so much of virtues and qualities and that much of Taqwa to remain free from even silly mistakes of swaghirah sins and not to commit any odd and undesired acts or words in anyway, then one needs to think about how much perfection should one be having to become a Nabi of Allah Pak and what standard Allah would determine for Him or how much Mahfuz or sacred they were turned in to by Allah Pak and His Habeeb, Huzur Pak Swallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam.”
“The gist is: Those who say, ‘Hazrat Adam Alaihis Salaam, The Nabi and Rwasool of Allah Pak had done a mistake and committed sins by eating gandhum’ – then, according to the Ahle Sunnat wal Jam’at, how much unlikable this belief and concept of theirs is and how much kufri this concept could be, is needless to mention. Refraining from such Aqida (doing Tawbah) is a Fard-Wajib (must) for all concerned.”
মন্তব্যসমূহ
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন